• The True Lies of Book Statistics

    , ,
    -Most readers do not get past page 18 in a book they have purchased.

    -70% of US adults have not been in a bookstore in the last five years.

    -The time Americans spend reading books 1996: 123 hours 2001: 109 hours

    -Used books were purchased by one out of ten book buyers in the previous nine months in 2002.

    -Used books account for $533 million in annual sales; 13% of the units sold and 5% of the total revenue. The heaviest book buyers buy more than one-third of their books used.

    -The largest-selling used books are: Mysteries, romance and science fiction. Used nonfiction sell best online.

    -A successful fiction book sells 5,000 copies

    -1.5+ million titles in print (currently available in the U.S.) Since 1776 22 million titles have been published.


    The book industry statistics listed above are from a recent post at Dan Poynter's parapublishing.com. The original post has many more fascinating facts about the publishing industry, sales, the used book industry, reading, and much more. While I'm not fond of statistics, since they almost always seem counter to the actual reality I live and work every day, they do provide a certain interest and get the brain working.

    Statistics are useful lies that get us to thinking about the truth.

    For example, I'm not suprised that 70% of people have not been to a used bookstore in the last five years. Why? Because they spent the money they would have spent on books going to see Titanic, Lord of the Rings, Shrek and Spiderman. Plus, so many people think of reading books are something that is "hard" to do. You actually have to "read", whereas in the movie theatre or at home watching TV you just sit there and the movies do all the work. And it's so much easier to just look at big pictures rather than having to read words one after the other. I'm being cynical, of course. But I think you get my point.

    What's cheering about some of these facts (and I can attest to in my daily work at the bookstore) is that more people are reading than ever before. I'd rather they were reading Tolstoy than Nora Roberts, but at least folks are reading. And while the statistics suggest that older people are more likely to frequent used bookstores, this is not the case in my experience. In my 30+ years of bookselling, I've always seen a large turn out of young people. Of course, they are sometimes there because they have to pick up books for summer reading, or are looking for a cheaper copy of a required book for class, but they are IN a bookstore which is a dangerous place to be. They might actually stumble across that copy of Thoreau's "Walden" or R.D. Laing's "Politics of Experience", which would corrupt them entirely with new ways of thinking.

    People ask me all the time if books will ever become obsolete. I don't think so. There is something unique and personal about a book that it's digitization can never duplicate. Our culture still values whats original and unique. And books are some of the most unique creations of civilization. They are little mind bombs set to go off in your head when you least expect it. Even our free books set out in boxes in front of the store, regularly disappear. No, books are more popular than ever. And as long as we value the imagination, books will always be the best way we have to communicate and express our thoughts and creations.

    Of course, there are those who think the exact opposite: books are an obsolete form of communication. One of the more interesting blog posts that counters my argument that books are here to stay is one by Jeff Jarvis. His "BuzzMachine" blog is highly intelligent and worth a read. Perhaps Jeff should write a book? Oh...I forgot, books are becoming obsolete. Ah, well....

    5 comments → The True Lies of Book Statistics

    1. Hello booklad , I just found your blog through Kate's blog and I love it.
      I live dangerously too since I frequent bookshops so much.

    2. Hello Anna, thanks for stopping by. I'm not quite as active a writer as Kate, but I try to cover what I think are interesting aspects of Books and Reading. Next up: Mickey Spillane is a poopy head and then, Ants are Fun!

    3. Anonymous said... 10:47 AM

      ants are fun! unless directed by fred olen ray! ;)

      the price of books is discouraging. sure most of us know used bookstores or the internet but I'd reason a good portion of that 70%(at least the 70% who might actually read) consist of average joes who when asked about books think you can only get them from borders,etc. and then the price and "reading is hard" mentality that goes along with them. I do see more young people reading, due to LOTR and Harry Potter,which is a better hope for the future than trying to convert the already dead bulbs. I'd hope they'd research and move on to other things(like fantasy kids? check out Robert E. Howard, Kuttner,etc). When I was a kid,for a buck or two the average joe could entertain himself with tripe like sundry generic westerns and the Executioner. the fact there was a "man's" market for paperbacks seems hard to believe now. Most books-even Stephen King-,the covers seemed geared towards females than "guys". and nowadays,what mechanic or ditchdiggers is going to shell out 8.99 for....ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!? A BOOK?!? sigh. Speaking of covers...maybe people would be moved by curiousity if we brought back great sexy,lurid,gorgeous art on the covers. everything now is the author's name in big letter,the title and a flower or a stiletto heel or a knife underneath. Even the covers of recent sci-fi and fantasy books are weak. I'm rambling! I just hope what you say and my observations are true, because I believe reading-even if Nora Roberts or The Destroyer are good for the mind and the soul. And there are too many mindless,souless drones out there-those still driving SUVs filling up the tank for $3.50 a gallon with the nerve to have both "support our troops" and "W" stickers on their oversize unecessary crap.

      wanna read what you have to say about Spillane, tho I might disagree. Whatever one thinks,those first five books are great violent noir that I feel get overlooked because of Spillane "the media image" and the fact they sold zillions instead of being impossible to find-or impossibly expensive-ala David Goodis or Willeford.

      check your email!

    4. Anonymous said... 10:48 AM

      ants are fun! unless directed by fred olen ray! ;)

      the price of books is discouraging. sure most of us know used bookstores or the internet but I'd reason a good portion of that 70%(at least the 70% who might actually read) consist of average joes who when asked about books think you can only get them from borders,etc. and then the price and "reading is hard" mentality that goes along with them. I do see more young people reading, due to LOTR and Harry Potter,which is a better hope for the future than trying to convert the already dead bulbs. I'd hope they'd research and move on to other things(like fantasy kids? check out Robert E. Howard, Kuttner,etc). When I was a kid,for a buck or two the average joe could entertain himself with tripe like sundry generic westerns and the Executioner. the fact there was a "man's" market for paperbacks seems hard to believe now. Most books-even Stephen King-,the covers seemed geared towards females than "guys". and nowadays,what mechanic or ditchdiggers is going to shell out 8.99 for....ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!? A BOOK?!? sigh. Speaking of covers...maybe people would be moved by curiousity if we brought back great sexy,lurid,gorgeous art on the covers. everything now is the author's name in big letter,the title and a flower or a stiletto heel or a knife underneath. Even the covers of recent sci-fi and fantasy books are weak. I'm rambling! I just hope what you say and my observations are true, because I believe reading-even if Nora Roberts or The Destroyer are good for the mind and the soul. And there are too many mindless,souless drones out there-those still driving SUVs filling up the tank for $3.50 a gallon with the nerve to have both "support our troops" and "W" stickers on their oversize unecessary crap.

      wanna read what you have to say about Spillane, tho I might disagree. Whatever one thinks,those first five books are great violent noir that I feel get overlooked because of Spillane "the media image" and the fact they sold zillions instead of being impossible to find-or impossibly expensive-ala David Goodis or Willeford.

      check your email!

    5. Hey, Scott. Thanks for stopping by. You've got some good points there. I especially like your comments on getting more lurid and retro book covers. I'll say! Don't think we are going to see eye to eye on Spillane though. I'm just about finished with "I, the Jury" for the second time. Needed to refresh my memory for misogynistic racist macho wish fulfillment fiction of the late forties. I'll be posting here in a week or so with specifics. Feel free to wade in and start swinging, or better yet, avoid the Mike Hammer style and debate with me!

      Thanks for reading my blog, Scott. And I got he joke about FOR. Lisa and I had a good laugh!